Advocacy

Friends of Seattle's picture

Letter Urging Council Not to Repeal Commuter Tax, Offering Amendments if They Do

We sent the below letter via email to the City Council regarding the commuter tax. The Council plans to vote on the cut on Thursday, November 12 or Friday, November 13.

 

Dear Councilmembers,

I am writing to urge you to keep the commuter tax (Employee Hours Tax) and not repeal it during your budget votes on Thursday and Friday. The Council’s concern for Seattle’s businesses is admirable, but this is the wrong solution to the problem -- at $91 per year for the average business, the cut will offer little succor to struggling businesses. Meanwhile, the 20-year Bridging the Gap infrastructure-building program would be robbed of $100 million.

That fiscal hit, together with the city’s likely need to allocate new commercial parking tax revenue and new vehicle fees to the deep-bore tunnel, means the city’s vaunted Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans would become empty gestures. For the foreseeable future, too little funding would be available for sidewalks, bike lanes, and other such improvements. Now is time to make good on the Council’s commitments to build a walkable, bike-friendly, sustainable city. Keep the commuter tax.

If you do choose to cut it, I suggest two amendments to your plans. First, merely suspend the tax and reinstate it in two years when the economy will improve. Second, direct council central staff to prepare a report on the cut’s economic effect, with the report due to the Council in one year. The report should focus on the number of jobs and the amount of economic growth created directly by the cut. That way, the Council will accumulate actual evidence whether tax cutting is sound economic policy.

But the Council should not cut the commuter tax, because the economics tilt in favor of retaining it. Interest rates on municipal bonds are very low, and contractors are submitting low bids for city projects. By borrowing money now against future tax revenue, the city can get the most for the taxpayers’ money while giving the local economy a boost, especially in the beleaguered construction industry. Think of all the new construction projects and new living-wage jobs that will result.

Keeping the commuter tax will create more jobs, allow the city to build when its buying power is greatest, and move the city towards achieving its progressive transportation goals.

Sincerely,

Gary Manca
President, Friends of Seattle
 

Friends of Seattle's picture

Text of the Ordinance that Would Repeal the Commuter Tax

Here is the text of the City Council Bill 116592, the ordinance that would repeal the commuter tax (officially known as the "Employee Hours Tax"). Tim Burgess is the sponsor; the co-sponsors are Sally Clark, Richard Conlin, and Bruce Harrell. The full text is below the jump.

Friends of Seattle's picture

Sally Clark on the Commuter Tax (aka "Head Tax" or "Employee Hours Tax")

Councilmember Sally Clark, writing in the July edition of her "Seattle View" newsletter (the bolding added by us):

If you're overwhelmed reading stories about the down economy, join the club. Budget forecasts look grim for this autumn. Employers large and small continue to shed costs – like workers.  It's disheartening to see employers in our neighborhood business districts close up shop, both because of what that means to sidewalk energy, but also for all of the employees who no longer have income or health coverage.

Earlier this year City Council reviewed ways we can help lessen the impact of the recession and possibly speed recovery. Repeal of the Employee Hours Tax (sometimes known as the "head tax") was one of many ideas listed that could help Seattle businesses. To comply with the EHT, passed in 2006 as part of the Bridging the Gap transportation funding strategy, employers pay $25 for every employee who regularly drives a single occupancy vehicle for their commute. They pay zero on employees who bike, walk or carpool.

[read the rest below the jump]

Friends of Seattle's picture

Letter to Mayor Nickels & City Council About the Commuter Tax (aka "Head Tax")

As part of its advocacy work, Friends of Seattle signed the following letter.

Mayor Greg Nickels
Councilmembers Tim Burgess, Sally Clark
Richard Conlin, Jan Drago
Jean Godden, Bruce Harrell
Nick Licata, Richard McIver
Tom Rasmussen
600 4th Ave. 2nd Floor
Seattle, WA 98104

July 1st, 2009

Re: Proposed Repeal of Head Tax (Business Transportation Tax)

Dear Councilmembers and Mayor Nickels,

Funding from the Head Tax (also called the Business Transportation Tax), a tax which is relatively insignificant for individual business, is an important source of funding for transportation improvements that help to promote more responsible forms of transportation, such as biking and walking. While $4.7 million is not much of SDOT’s budget, it makes up a large percentage of total funding for pedestrian and bicycling projects in Seattle. Because of the incredible infrastructure deficit, especially in the Southeast and North parts of the city, and the fact that a prioritized project list has been identified through the draft Pedestrian Master Plan, it seems clear that there is a use and a specific need for these funds.

In fact, there is a clear use and a specific need for funding much greater than this, which is why Seattle needs all it can get for transportation projects.

administrator's picture

Let's Take a Vote on a New Parks Levy (Op-Ed)

Friends of Seattle is in the news.

Gary Manca & Nate Cormier, "Let's Take a Vote on a New Parks Levy," Seattle Times (6 May 2008)

By Gary Manca and Nate Cormier
Special to The Times

Seattle's successful Pro Parks Levy is expiring at the end of this year, but our elected leaders have not yet committed to putting a new parks levy on the ballot. The City Council took a step in the right direction when it appointed a new citizen's committee to study the issue. Still, the committee may recommend waiting until 2009 or beyond, and Mayor Greg Nickels said he prefers a vote no earlier than 2010.

We come bearing a more urgent message: The public wants a new parks levy now.

administrator's picture

Tunnel or Rebuild? Neither (Op-Ed in Real Change)

Friends of Seattle is in the news.

Sean Howell & Gary Manca, "Tunnel or Rebuild? Neither,"Real Change (11 Jan 2007)

January 10, 2007

Tunnel or Rebuild? Neither
City needs to demand none of the above to replace Alaskan Way Viaduct

BY GARY MANCA AND SEAN HOWELL
Guest Writers

The worst thing about the governor playing hot potato with the Alaskan Way viaduct decision is that the potato she has tossed to the voters is rotten. The six-lane tunnel is unaffordable, and a new Viaduct would be a monstrosity that violates Seattle zoning codes and shoreline protection ordinances.

Our leaders should refuse to play the governor’s game and demand the state to go back to the drawing board. No good options for the voters to consider, no vote. But if the City Council does force a vote, we should have a strict up-or-down ballot on a new viaduct. That way, we can reply to the state when it tries to sell us its only "feasible" option: "No, thanks. You can keep your rotten potato!"

administrator's picture

What the Governor Should Have Done About Viaduct (Op-Ed)

Friends of Seattle is in the news.

Mike O'Brien & Gary Manca, "What the Governor Should Have Done About Viaduct," Seattle P-I (2 Jan 2007)

By MICHAEL O'BRIEN AND GARY MANCA
GUEST COLUMNISTS

Now that Gov. Chris Gregoire has punted the Alaskan Way Viaduct decision to Seattle voters, we face a bruising public contest pitting a tunnel we can't afford against an elevated rebuild requiring us to kiss the Elliott Bay waterfront goodbye.

Residents are outraged that the governor foisted this dreary decision on them. But it's no surprise she avoided the political thorns attached to both bad options.

Syndicate content